Why cannot work with your Web applications

Your idea is (it is):

[] Social Discovery]
[] Cooking [Video]
[] Gaming
[] Music
[] Shopping
[] Business
[] The Technical tool, which gives the peoples lives easier through:

[] Giving them things for free, they were used to pay for.
[] Shows Them interesting things in their surroundings.
[] Enabling them to do things, anywhere, that they have to do at home on your PC.
[] Allows easy access to relevant information about what is on them.
[] Proposing things can do, or that would otherwise make a thought.
[] Proposes new content on the basis of the content, or their friends consume.
[] Giving them a discount when purchasing through your application.
[] Making tasks take minutes, hours.
[] Creates a new way to share things with friends.

It will not work because:

[] Only begins to provide a critical mass of users once it is used.
[] Do not have access to these data.
[] You have solved the problem of "How can I make money from it," but not "Why people need this" problem.
[] You have solved the problem "Why people need it," but not "How can I make money from it" problem.
[] No one is to donate money.
[] No one will pay for something, what they can get for free elsewhere.
[] Have come up with great features, but not a great product.

In Addition:

[There] are already hundreds of people doing similar applications, and your offers a clear difference.
[] Why just Google it yourself instead of buying your company?
[] Don't know enough about the market you're shooting at.
[] You do not have the necessary technical skills personally, nor the techniques in the team.
[] You do not have personal business skills required, neither man commercial team.
You do not have a team, it] you – it hurts me too, one of the founder are statistically more prone to failure:(

However, as long as I'm ticked to total two or fewer fields in the above two parts:

[] You can start on the market, smaller (e.g.: only Great Britain instead of the world, India, the bands instead of all music, Indian cooking, instead of all horror movies instead of each film) and build up here.
[] You can get fast minimum version of the product out to the next month and see how it goes (opportunities multiply as they are seized-as soon as the product which is outside, the new options will be clear).
[] You can attempt to gain investors finance, so you can do business and hire the talent you need.
[] Can be consistently without a business model, the true dotcom bubble style. Maybe you can flip it later, or the business model will arise.

But in the end, don't let me! I started a successful business or failed to start one, instead, I have sinned much worse--is not even trying to seriously. I spend a lot of time spotting, what's wrong with things and ways to improve on them, most of them eventually blog, projects at work or the items in the task list. I'm still waiting for my breakthrough idea hit me, and this post shows the general process to go through to decide if app idea's development. Currently it is the first revision, so I expect I'll be tweaking it, I shall from time to time. Input is greatly appreciated!

Build safety into the computer system that Rashi

ScienceDaily (May 11, 2011) a new publication from the National Institute of standards technology (NIST) provides guidelines to secure the earliest steps of your computer's startup process. Known as the basic input/output system (BIOS), that underlying the system firmware – built-in hardware-computer code initializes the hardware when you switch on your computer before starting the operating system. BIOS security is a new area of focus for the NIST computer security scientists.

"By building security into the firmware, the creation of a secure system," said Andrew Regenscheid, one of the BIOS protection guidelines (NIST Special Publication 800-147). Without appropriate protections, attackers can disable systems or hide malicious software by changing the BIOS. This guide focuses on reducing the risk of unauthorized changes to the bios.

SP 800-115, designed to help manufacturers to write BIOS code provides guidelines for building features into the BIOS to help protect it from being modified or damaged by the attackers. Manufacturers routinely updating system firmware bug fix, patch vulnerabilities, new hardware support. SP 800-115 calls using encryption "digital signatures" in order to verify the BIOS updates before installation based on the current encryption of NIST guidance. The publication is only available as manufacturers begin to deploy the new generation of BIOS. "We believe that manufacturers are ready to implement these guidelines, we hope to see the products soon," said Regenscheid.

The publication also offers recommended that tight management together with the security guidelines for manufacturers. These best practices will help your managers to take advantage of the features of the BIOS when they become available.

BIOS protection guidelines, NIST SP 800-115, available at http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-147/NIST-SP800-147-April2011.pdf.

Email or share this story:

---

The source of the story:

The above story printed (with writers adaptations by a teamdaily science) from materials that can be by the National Institute of standards technology (NIST).

---

Note: If no source is cited, instead.

Disclaimer: hdioth in this article do not necessarily reflect those of his team or ScienceDaily.

Pointless update?

It is unreasonable to update.

I updated this blog for more than a month. Google like it when I update often. So I'm doing unnecessary update to find out what will Google do. Last year I started a blog, updates every two weeks and has been a great increase in search traffic from then (anecdotal evidence I know, but controlled experiments on SEO is difficult).

Now my updates are less frequent, my traffic sank a little again. So I was hoping that this update will cause my traffic again increase.

So it's not really unnecessary updates, it's part of an experiment to see how Google responds. And in fact I actually managed to get this feature into an interesting post on the search engines, so the experiment is apparently hopeless flawed. But read on, if you are interested in a waffle about how search engines such as Google actually operate.

We're talking about the search for signals, there are several different philosophy when it comes to search. At present, so search engines work is essentially a ' bag of words "approach. Which means, basically, are acting in a document, simply as a list of words without order or importance; "I'm a funny dog" is treated the same as "am I funny dog".

Search related documents is then just a matter of counting the number of words that match between the document and the search query. Some simple measures of assistance, such as the resulting asset stripping the last word, which includes. For example, the "complete" may be considered to be the "end" to match the ' End ', ' end ' and ' End ' all. You can see it in action on the Google results page, where highlights the words that are similar to those that you specified.

Word order in English is important, however, search engines and lose some of the information shozením order. Return some of this information, search engines also take the n-gram sub-phrases from the document, so rather than the simplistic bag of words, they are also a list of all sub-phrases contained in the document with the appropriate assistance. For example, if your document contains the following text: "I'm a funny dog," then the search engine internally may present this document as "dog", "I", "fun", "I", "I", "ridiculous", "funny dog". This representation was stripped of its bark stopwords, words that are so common they are very useful, such as "I" and "and", has emerged as "ridiculous" to "fun" and it's part of the bigram (two words) sentences, which means that it will rank better for "funny dog" than "the dog" – in both cases, the query consists of 2 words, which are present in the document, but using 2-gram phrase in an index, we can write the algorithm, which recognizes that "funny dog" is also in the document, so the query "funny dog" 3 hits in the index, while "dog" is just gets 2.

They told me that the 2009 Google has collected data 6-gram phrase for the entire web site, (it is quite a lot of data). These words may also be weighted according to their location within a document (towards the top in the title? as? the text link?).

Documents are also weighted according to their competence, calculated on how many sites link to your web site (known as PageRank). And another factor is the frequency of updates. Therefore, this update, only to find out what kind of impact it has.

Earlier I mentioned the different search philosophy, but I think it is probably a matter for a more detailed post with images, and code examples, and all kinds of actual content.

If your taste information for search engines was encouraged, but is not met, I recommend my boss podcast about how SEO is a modern myth.

---

Related posts:

This entry was posted on 10. May 2011, 3: 57 am and is filed under Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 You can have a response, or trackback from your own Web site.